Twenty Years After McCleskey v. Kemp

  1. News From Columbia Law
  2. Story Archive
  3. Twenty Years After McCleskey v. Kemp
Twenty Years After McCleskey v. Kemp

 

Date: March 2-3, 2007
symposium.jpg
Location: Columbia Law School
Jerome Greene Hall
435 West 116th Street
(at Amsterdam Avenue)
New York, NY 10027
All panels are free to the public.
Sponsored by: NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund and Columbia Law School

> Symposium Program

FRIDAY, MARCH 2, 2007

OPENING EVENT

11:00 am—2:00 pm
Screening: “The Trials of Darryl Hunt”
Sponsored by Clifford Chance, LLP
Following the screening, there will be a discussion with the Filmmakers, Darryl Hunt, and his attorney, Mark Rabil.

SYMPOSIUM

2:00 pm –2:30 pm
Introduction and Welcome
Jeffrey Fagan, Columbia Law School
Theodore M. Shaw, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund

2:30 pm–3:15 pm
The Harold Leventhal Memorial Lecture: Setting the Stage: Race and the Death Penalty Before McCleskey
Anthony Amsterdam, New York University School of Law

3:15 pm–3:30 pm
Break

3:30 pm–5:00 pm
THE LEGAL, POLITICAL AND SOCIALCONTEXT OF McCLESKEY

  • Moderator
    Christina Swarns, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
  • McCleskey in Historical Context
    Richard Banks, Stanford Law School
  • Reflections on Litigating the Case
    John Charles Boger, University of North Carolina Law School; Counsel of Record for Warren McCleskey in the Supreme Court
  • The McCleskey Decision: Justice Brennan’s Dissent
    Lawrence C. Marshall, Stanford Law School
  • Commentary
    Richard Burr, Burr and Welch

5:15 pm–8:00 pm
RECEPTION AND DINNER (By Invitation Only)

  • Hosted by David Schizer, Dean Columbia Law School
  • Keynote Speaker: Bob Herbert, Columnist, The New York Times


SATURDAY, MARCH 3, 2007

9:00 am–10:30 am
THE IMPACT OF McCLESKEY ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT BETWEEN 1987 AND 2007

  • Moderator
    George Kendall, Holland & Knight, LLP
  • Race and Proportionality After McCleskey: Did Anything Change?
    David Baldus, University of Iowa, College of Law
  • The Trial Process: How McCleskey Impacted Representation and Jury Decisionmaking
    Sheri Lynn Johnson, Cornell Law School
  • Access to Justice: How McCleskey Affected Policing Policies and Criminal Justice Outcomes
    Jeffrey Fagan, Columbia University Law School
  • Commentary
    Cathleen Price, Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama

10:30 am–11:00 am
Break

11:00 am–12:30 pm
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE I: A THEORETICAL MODEL FOR GETTING PAST McCLESKEY

  • Moderator
    Charles Ogletree, Harvard Law School
  • Transforming the Popular Discourse on Crime, Race and Rights
    Kendall Thomas, Columbia Law School
  • Constructing a Criminal Justice System Free of Racial Bias
    Dorothy E. Roberts, Northwestern University School of Law
  • Civil and Human Rights Advocacy as a Vehicle for Reforming the Criminal Justice System
    David Rudovsky, University of Pennsylvania, School of Law
  • Commentary
    Miriam Gohara, Resource Counsel, Federal Capital Habeas Project

12:30 pm–2:00 pm
LUNCH (By Invitation Only)

  • Keynote Speaker
    Theodore M. Shaw, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund

2:00 pm–3:30 pm
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE II: THE NEW FRONT LINES OF RACE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM LITIGATION, LEGISLATION AND PROSECUTION

  • Moderator
    Charles Ogletree, Harvard Law School
  • What is the Future of Litigation in Race and Criminal Justice Reform?
    Bryan Stevenson, Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama
  • How Can Legislation Effect Change?
    Olati Johnson, Columbia Law School
  • How Should the Prosecutor Address Problems of Race and Discretion?
    Angela J. Davis, American University, Washington College of Law
  • Commentary
    Christina Swarns, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund

3:30 pm–4:30 pm
MOVING FORWARD: WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS?

  • Moderator
    Steven Hawkins, JEHT Foundation
  • The Role of the Prosecutor
    Wayne McKenzie, Vera Institute of Justice
  • The Role of the Legislature
    Rodney Ellis, Texas State Senate
  • The Role of Advocates for Racial Justice
    David Singleton, Ohio Justice and Policy Center

4:30 pm–5:00 pm
Closing Remarks
Gara LaMarche, Open Society Institute

> About the Symposium

In the past quarter century, few cases on criminal law and procedure have had the reach and impact of McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987). In McCleskey, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) presented the United States Supreme Court with strong statistical evidence showing that race played a pivotal role in the Georgia capital punishment system. Specifically, LDF introduced the landmark Baldus Study, which showed that in the life and death calculus of capital cases, blacks were treated differently than similarly situated whites. Although this evidence gave the Court the opportunity to acknowledge and repudiate the arbitrary infl uence of race in the administration of the death penalty, the Court found no constitutional error in a system where blacks and whites were treated unequally.

The McCleskey decision reached far beyond the confines of capital punishment. It all but completely insulated criminal justice laws and policies from racially disparate impact challenges and ultimately set the stage for 20 years of increasing racial disproportionality within the criminal justice system. Numerous studies conducted in the 20 years that followed McCleskey have shown that race now plays a critical role in virtually all aspects of the criminal justice process. African Americans are stopped, ticketed, searched and/or arrested by the police at far higher rates than whites. Relative to their rates of arrest and participation in crime, African Americans are disproportionately represented within U.S. jails and prisons. Indeed, within a decade of McCleskey the number of minority citizens in prison exceeded the total number of persons incarcerated in the U.S. in the year preceding the decision.

Today, one in three African-American males will enter state or federal prison at some point in their lifetimes; and while African Americans make up only 12 percent of the U.S. population, they constitute 44 percent of sentenced inmates—the largest group behind bars. Legal mobilizations such as the “War on Drugs” worsened racial disparity by mandating harsher sentences for drugs whose impacts were disproportionately felt in communities of color. And race continues to infl uence the decision between who lives and who dies at the hands of the criminal justice system: race of defendant and/or race of victim are dominant factors in the decision to seek death in numerous jurisdictions including Pennsylvania, Maryland, Indiana, Kentucky, New Jersey, and North Carolina.

The 20th anniversary of the McCleskey decision presents a unique opportunity for the racial justice community to renew and reinvigorate the struggle to achieve balance and fairness in the administration of justice in the United States. With the “Pursuing Racial Fairness in Criminal Justice” Symposium, LDF and Columbia Law School are bringing together leading scholars on race, crime and law, as well as activists and practitioners to discuss new ways of challenging, and ultimately reversing, McCleskey’s reach through legislative advocacy, institutional reform, and litigation.